LeBron didn't start super teams:
In the past couple weeks, there has been a lot of chatter about super teams in the NBA and which one came first. I've already addressed this in a previous post, but I'll quickly recap my thoughts here. The idea that the first super team wasn't Miami is just dumb. The Lakers and Celtics of the '60s and '80s were assembled through the draft and trades, so it's apples and oranges. People don't get upset about a franchise drafting great players or making great trades. When people refer to "super teams," they're referring to the collaboration of stars. LeBron tried to claim he didn't start super teams, and pointed to the '99 Rockets, the '04 Lakers or the '08 Celtics. Here's the difference between those teams and Miami: those were veterans teaming up together. No dynasties happened, nor were any even expected. When Miami got together, there's a reason why they went on record saying, "not one, not two, not three..." and proclaiming they were going to win more than seven titles. Because they were superstars teaming up in their primes. When you haven't played a game and you project yourself to win more than seven titles, you are a super team! Only two teams have ever assembled and immediately evoked images of dynasty: the 2011 Heat and the 2017 Warriors. So you can bring up the '99 Rockets, '04 Lakers, or '08 Celtics all you want, but the ceiling for those teams was never as high, nor the window as wide.
Add LeBron to any team and they're a contender:
This is a popular narrative trumpeted by people. The main reason people say this is by saying look at Cleveland with and without him and by looking at Miami with and without him. Unsurprisingly, that is a very simplistic view that completely ignores any and all context. How so? Because LeBron isn't the only difference between those teams. Let's look at the 2010 Cavs vs the 2011 Cavs (we'll just compare the top 8 guys by minutes played.):
LeBron, Mo Williams, Anthony Parker, Anderson Varejao, JJ Hickson, Delonte West, Zydrunas Ilgauskas, and Shaq
JJ Hickson, Ramon Sessions, Anthony Parker, Daniel Gibson, Antawn Jamison, Ryan Hollins, Mo Williams, and Anderson Varejao
LeBron wasn't the only change, so you can't pin all the results of the season on one thing. (For more in-depth analysis on this specific change, check out one of my previous posts.) Not included in that post is the coaching change. Following LeBron's exit, Mike Brown was fired. And while Mike Brown isn't a great coach, he's not as bad as Byron Scott. Byron Scott hasn't won 25 games in a season since 2009! In thirteen full seasons, he had a winning record in exactly four of them. As for the 2011 Miami Heat, they improved by 11 wins. And that was adding LeBron and Bosh. No in-depth analysis required. Now let's forward to LeBron's Miami departure and his return to Cleveland.
LeBron, Chris Bosh, Mario Chalmers, Norris Cole, Ray Allen, Dwyane Wade, Shane Battier, and Chris Andersen
Luol Deng, Mario Chalmers, Dwyane Wade, Chris Bosh, Norris Cole, Hassan Whiteside, Chris Andersen, and James Ennis
The Heat didn't just lose LeBron. They also lost Ray Allen and Shane Battier and Bosh played barely more than half the season.
Tristan Thompson, Kyrie Irving, Jarret Jack, Dion Waiters, Anderson Varejao, Luol Deng, Matthew Dellavedova, and Tyler Zeller
Kyrie Irving, Kevin Love, LeBron, Tristan Thompson, JR Smith, Matthew Dellavedova, Timofey Mozgov, and Shawn Marion
The 2015 Cavs didn't just add LeBron; it was almost a completely different roster. Tristan Thompson and Kyrie Irving were in their fourth years, and naturally should have gotten better, and they added Kevin Love. But that wasn't it. If those weren't improvements enough, they also traded for JR Smith, Timofey Mozgov, and Iman Shumpert. And if you think that trade didn't make a huge impact, consider this: Prior to the trade, Cleveland was 19-16. That's a 45-win pace. Then there was a two game adjustment period, where Smith came off the bench one game and Mozgov came off the bench the next game (they lost both games). Once Smith and Mozgov (and eventually Shumpert) were added to the rotation, they went 34-11. That's a 62-win pace. So when you say that LeBron can make any team a contender, do you actually mean LeBron and Bosh, Allen, and Battier or LeBron and Love, Smith, and Shumpert?
Not only did LeBron not single-handedly turn those teams around, but we also have information that contradicts the idea that LeBron, as a solo entity, can make any team a contender. In the Windhorst article I addressed in my previous post, he had a fascinating tidbit about LeBron's first venture into free agency in 2010:
"When the Chicago Bulls lost a competitive 4-1 series to James and the Cavs in 2010 they hoped it could be turned into a net positive. Young guard Derrick Rose starred in the short series and Joakim Noah, in addition to insulting the city of Cleveland, showed promise as a valuable postseason performer during the first-round series.
The Bulls made a pitch to James as a free agent a few months later, touting their growing core of Rose, Noah, Luol Deng and Taj Gibson. The Bulls also made presentations to Dwyane Wade and Chris Bosh. When they couldn't open enough salary-cap space to sign all three and Rose declined to directly recruit James, the window closed."
Chicago had Rose, Noah, Deng, and Gibson and that wasn't good enough for LeBron so much so that they also would've needed to add Wade AND Bosh? If LeBron didn't think Chicago was good enough, how on earth are you going to tell me he could make Brooklyn or Sacramento a contender? Claiming that putting LeBron on a terrible team would instantly make them a contender ignores all the information to the contrary. Let's recap what has actually happened: LeBron didn't want to go to a talented Chicago team, instead teamed up with two of the best players in basketball and brought in really good veteran players, and then when that started to get a little old he went to Kyrie and brought in Kevin Love and traded for Smith, Shumpert and Mozgov. Not only do we have no record of him single-handedly carrying a lottery team to contention, but his moves have been exactly the opposite. Not only does he not team up with bad players, he intentionally seeks out great players. So no, teaming up with Bosh, Wade, Love, Kyrie, Allen, Battier, Smith, Thompson etc. isn't evidence that he would win with Willie Cauley-Stein and Ben McLemore.
None of this is to criticize LeBron's skill as a basketball player, but rather the myths surrounding him.